271
trabis
Re: XOOPS 2.5.3 Final Released
  • 2011/10/5 14:28

  • trabis

  • Core Developer

  • Posts: 2269

  • Since: 2006/9/1 1


@bjuti,

Good to know that you managed to get it working!
We have looked into the upgrade package and it seems ok. Maybe something went wrong with the download/unzip/copy procedure.



272
trabis
Re: help on installation
  • 2011/10/5 10:11

  • trabis

  • Core Developer

  • Posts: 2269

  • Since: 2006/9/1 1


Quote:

pinchecl wrote:
Parse error: syntax error, unexpected $end, expecting T_FUNCTION in /home/pinchecl/public_html/kernel/object.php on line 115.


This error is often related with server running php4.x instead of php5.2 (required by XOOPS 2.5.x)

@josephpratt, check your php version please.



273
trabis
Re: XOOPS 2.5.3 Final Released
  • 2011/10/5 9:42

  • trabis

  • Core Developer

  • Posts: 2269

  • Since: 2006/9/1 1


@timgno,

@redheadedrod is correct, the protector error message should be removed if xoops version is greater then 2.4.x. Please ignore that error.





274
trabis
Re: XOOPS 2.5.3 Final Released
  • 2011/10/5 9:32

  • trabis

  • Core Developer

  • Posts: 2269

  • Since: 2006/9/1 1


Quote:

bjuti wrote:
@Trabis I did all of that and it didn't resolve the problem.

BUT

When I cloned default templates to custom ones I saw that all ' was written in template like #039; and I've deleted all cloned templates and now is showing default ones.


That might be a bug in the templates manager. Same bug that affects code editor. & a m p ; are replaced by &. Actually, the bug is in module.textsanitizer, I've tried to fixed it on 2.4.4 but it caused issues in some modules(shoutbox) and french translation that was using htmlspecialchars. The fix was reverted on 2.4.5.
I will have to review it again.

Quote:

One more BUT

Now Xoops isn't showing all the blocks. There is one custom html block on the front page and it isn't shown, also left and right columns are images and there is nothing in that blocks.


There was a change related with blocks on front page. If you have a module set for front page, the blocks are only shown in index.php. If the Uri is index.php?cat=1, that page is not longer consider the front page.
I'm not sure if that is your case.

Quote:

Debugger say:
Notice: Use of undefined constant _MSC_CLICK_TO_OPEN_IMAGE - assumed '_MSC_CLICK_TO_OPEN_IMAGE' in file /class/textsanitizer/image/image.php line 68
Notice: Use of undefined constant _MSC_CLICK_TO_OPEN_IMAGE - assumed '_MSC_CLICK_TO_OPEN_IMAGE' in file /class/textsanitizer/image/image.php line 69
Notice: Use of undefined constant _MSC_CLICK_TO_OPEN_IMAGE - assumed '_MSC_CLICK_TO_OPEN_IMAGE' in file /class/textsanitizer/image/image.php line 70
Notice: Use of undefined constant _MSC_CLICK_TO_OPEN_IMAGE - assumed '_MSC_CLICK_TO_OPEN_IMAGE' in file /class/textsanitizer/image/image.php line 71
Notice: Use of undefined constant _MSC_CLICK_TO_OPEN_IMAGE - assumed '_MSC_CLICK_TO_OPEN_IMAGE' in file /class/textsanitizer/image/image.php line 71
Notice: Use of undefined constant _MSC_CLICK_TO_OPEN_IMAGE - assumed '_MSC_CLICK_TO_OPEN_IMAGE' in file /class/textsanitizer/image/image.php line 68
Notice: Use of undefined constant _MSC_CLICK_TO_OPEN_IMAGE - assumed '_MSC_CLICK_TO_OPEN_IMAGE' in file /class/textsanitizer/image/image.php line 69
Notice: Use of undefined constant _MSC_CLICK_TO_OPEN_IMAGE - assumed '_MSC_CLICK_TO_OPEN_IMAGE' in file /class/textsanitizer/image/image.php line 70
Notice: Use of undefined constant _MSC_CLICK_TO_OPEN_IMAGE - assumed '_MSC_CLICK_TO_OPEN_IMAGE' in file /class/textsanitizer/image/image.php line 71
Notice: Use of undefined constant _MSC_CLICK_TO_OPEN_IMAGE - assumed '_MSC_CLICK_TO_OPEN_IMAGE' in file /class/textsanitizer/image/image.php line 71

Also there is no background color in css?


I'm starting to think that you have missing files in your installation. Also, clean your browser cache, there were changes in js/css from 2.4.5 to 2.5.3



275
trabis
Re: News or XNews module?
  • 2011/10/4 18:57

  • trabis

  • Core Developer

  • Posts: 2269

  • Since: 2006/9/1 1


Quote:

mboyden wrote:
FWIW, I don't think "SEO-friendly" URLs matter:


My opinion is that SEF URLS only matter on search result pages because a user will more likely click on a nice URL then on one with many parameters. A friendly URL can also give the user a preview of the page content.

SEF(I would call it search user friendly 'SUF'), in my opinion, has nothing to do with SEO. I have one XOOPS site on first page(many times on first place) for several of the most important keywords of its niche and I never used URL rewriting.

More important yet, many of my search engine traffic comes from the 'not so important' keywords. It is not that important to get the most relevant ones. What you really need is unique content, the more unique content you have, the more successful you site will be.

Friendly URLS have low priority in my XOOPS feature request list. I also find them very hard to implement on the current XOOPS architecture.




276
trabis
Re: XOOPS 2.5.3 Final Released
  • 2011/10/4 18:42

  • trabis

  • Core Developer

  • Posts: 2269

  • Since: 2006/9/1 1


@bjuti,

- set 'check templates for modification' to 'yes' in system settings
- change template set to default.
- If you have error, try manually clean cache folder
- If error remains, probably you have a bad template in your module and not in the cache. Edit module template and fix it(publisher_items_new.html line 10)
- With the above settings, any change done manually in the module templates should have immediate effect.
- If all is working, then copy your templates to theme folder. When this is done, templates will be fetch from theme directory.
- If you are done with template editing, set 'check templates for modification' to 'no'



277
trabis
Re: XOOPS 2.5.x Translations
  • 2011/10/4 13:04

  • trabis

  • Core Developer

  • Posts: 2269

  • Since: 2006/9/1 1


There were two language defines that were not added in changelog.
In protector modinfo.php this was added:
define($constpref.'_STOPFORUMSPAM_ACTION','Stop Forum Spam');
define($constpref.'_STOPFORUMSPAM_ACTIONDSC','Checks POST data against spammers registered on www.stopforumspam.com database. Requires php CURL lib.');


Please check if your translations have this new defines.
Thanks.



278
trabis
Re: Xopps 2.5.2
  • 2011/10/4 12:42

  • trabis

  • Core Developer

  • Posts: 2269

  • Since: 2006/9/1 1


@ timgno:

That is probably related with the 2.5.2 install problem.

I think data is not being correctly inserted because your mainfile.php DB_CHARSET is not equal to the database charset. That problem was fixed on 2.5.3. If you could do a fresh install of 2.5.3 and test it again I would appreciate it.

Thank you.



279
trabis
Re: XOOPS 2.5.3 Final Released
  • 2011/10/4 12:14

  • trabis

  • Core Developer

  • Posts: 2269

  • Since: 2006/9/1 1


@JCash,
You need to enable 'check templates for modification' in admin preferences. If you don't do that, you will have to clean caches/smarty_compile



280
trabis
Re: ADODb 0.24 - Advanced Database Peformance
  • 2011/10/3 23:55

  • trabis

  • Core Developer

  • Posts: 2269

  • Since: 2006/9/1 1


Excuse my ignorance, but what is the difference between a mysql query produced
by "1996 database class" and the one produced by ADODb?

What do you think is the reason for better ADODb benchmark?

Thank you.




TopTop
« 1 ... 25 26 27 (28) 29 30 31 ... 190 »



Login

Who's Online

144 user(s) are online (99 user(s) are browsing Support Forums)


Members: 0


Guests: 144


more...

Donat-O-Meter

Stats
Goal: $100.00
Due Date: May 31
Gross Amount: $0.00
Net Balance: $0.00
Left to go: $100.00
Make donations with PayPal!

Latest GitHub Commits