Who's Online 114 user(s) are online ( 8 user(s) are browsing XoopsWiki) Members: 0 Guests: 114 more...
|
First Team Report
Discussion ^HERE^ Crip posted request for DPT discussions.
_________________________________
Proposal Team Update
The team has made more than 1500 posts in more than 70 threads with the purpose of determining the documents that will soon be sent to the community.
I would like to highlight the great work done by the team in a constructive manner and I am very happy to be part of this team while helping a little with my bad English.
Giba Reporting in XEU.
(edited by SJ)
Draft Proposal 1
This is the home of the Draft Proposal Preparation Team. A XOOPS community initiative.
Our mission is to draft a proposal on how best to improve the organizational structure of the XOOPS Project.
This proposal is being drafted by volunteers from the community for submission to the Community and the current organizational bodies: The Project Council and the XOOPS Foundation. This wiki is here to keep the community informed and involved in the drafting process. To provide feedback, please see this News Item on XOOPS.org
Stage 1 ~24-10-2007
| Stage 2 ~1-11-2007
| Stage 3 ~10-11-2007
| Stage 4 ~15-11-2007
| Stage 5 Current
| Stage 6 Current
|
Community calls for change
| Team forms
| Team discusses and forms agenda
| Agenda 1 Team discusses and develops procedures
| Agenda 2 General principles for the proposal
| Agenda 3 Main functional units of the project
|
Stage 7
| Stage 8
| Stage 9
| Stage 10
| Stage 11 ~31-12-2007
| Stage 12
|
Agenda 4 Cooperation with the current XOOPS project management bodies
| Agenda 5 Outline of the draft proposal
| Agenda 6 Development of the full proposal
| Submission to the community for final approval
| Submission to the Project Council & XOOPS Foundation
| A new XOOPS?
|
Stage 1: Community calls for change...
In September and October of 2007, not for the first time, posts on many threads in the xoops.org forums were voicing strong dissatisfaction with and indeed direct opposition towards the way in which the XOOPS project was being managed. The threads boiled to a head with these three being key: Improving XOOPS governance, Proposal: Towards A Sustainable Open Source Project and [Proposal Improving XOOPS Governance]). Large parts of the community felt alienated from the project, ignored and unappreciated. Valuable members had started to leave, and there was considerable concern that if the project continued on the course that it was on at that time, it would lead to the project's undignified and totally unacceptable demise. Various proposals were published from: phppp, sailjapan, mamba, kc0maz, predator, JMorris, DaveL, damaster, gtop00 and much debate was held on them. Finally, community action was deemed unavoidable.
Stage 2: Team forms...
On Oct 25th, through the forums at xoops.org, a call was made for volunteers to put together a proposal:
|
Quote: phppp wrote: Establish a XOOPS Structure Proposal Preparation team: phppp to invite expressions of interest in joining the draft proposal preparation team from the community from anyone who would like to help compose it (only for the draft proposal, literally), by October 26th; [edit: Later extended to October 28th]
Anyone who are willing to work on the proposal, please express in the forum or contact me then we will publish the "proposal preparation team" so that every one feel convenient to make constructive feedback.
[from post #14 of this thread]
|
Over the course of the next few days, there were many nominations and volunteers. Some nominees turned down their nominations, while others agreed to take part though through the regular forums at x.o. On the 1st of November, a sub forum was created at xoops.org for the team to assemble and get to work. Accordingly, team members did just that. Nominees that accepted their nominations were: bluestocking, catzwolf, davidl_2, gibaphp, gtop00, JAVesey, kc0maz, madfish, mamba, phppp, predator, sailjapan, seth_sd, skenow, vaughan and wizanda.
Stage 3: Team discusses and forms agenda...
The first issue to be discussed was exactly what the team's work was. Over the course of the first week, the team came up with the following agenda:
Agenda 1: Procedural matters
Goals: Agree on a procedure for holding the meetings, making decisions and resolving disputes, and for keeping the community, including international support sites, informed and involved. Also, to decide where and how the main discussions will be held (please refer to the suggested procedural arrangements document), how to engage international community sites and to seek the participation and agreement of the Project Council and Foundation Board in the Draft Proposal Preparation Team.
1.1 Election of Chair. [completed]
1.2 Election of Rapporteur(s) and definition of additional roles. [completed]
1.3 Participation in the Draft Proposal Preparation Team by the Foundation and Project Council. [completed – both have agreed by email to participate].
1.4 Request the current Foundation Board and Project Council to advise the team of any key issues of concern they have in terms of the XOOPS entity overall structure [completed]
1.5 Decision making procedures. [completed]
1.6 Conduct of team members. [completed]
1.7 Community participation including engagement of international support sites. [completed]
1.8 Venue for the discussions. [completed]
1.9 Amendments to Draft Agenda. [completed]
1.10 Tentative schedule. [completed]
Agenda 2: General principles for the proposal
Goals:Agree on general principles before discussing any details (eg. is there broad support for principles such as ‘meritocracy’, ‘open participation’ etc). This will help us identify areas of common ground and provide filters to sort ideas.
Agenda 3: Main functional units of the project
Goals:Identify the key functional elements of the project and discuss mechanisms to coordinate effort across groups and also across the international community. This will help us reach agreement on logical management units for the project.
Agenda 4: Cooperation with the current XOOPS project management bodies. Goals: Discuss the role of the current Foundation and Council and identify opportunities for the project to improve communication and collaboration with the new project management bodies.
Agenda 5: Outline of the draft proposal
Goals:Agree on a list of documents that need to be developed (eg. organizational chart, terms of reference for management units, code of conduct etc.); develop an outline/structure of the draft proposal and other documents, identifying the main sections (just the headings).
Agenda 6: Development of the full proposal
Goals: Use the outline drafted above as the basis for drafting the full proposal, section by section, as required.
Other agenda items - as required.
|
Stage 4: (Agenda 1) Team discusses and develops procedures...
Once the agenda (detailed above) had been agreed on, the team moved on to it's next task. Developing a statement on procedural matters.
Procedural matters
1. Terms of reference for the Proposal Drafting Team
1. Draft a proposal for a new management structure for XOOPS that:
a. Encourages broad community participation in the project, including among international support sites.
b. Provides for democracy or meritocracy among active contributors, vesting authority in groups rather than individuals.
c. Ensures coordination of effort between working groups.
d. Identifies a mechanism to promote collaboration between the Community and the new Project Management bodies.
2. Develop a community consultation process, inclusive of international support sites, that will:
a. Keep the community informed of progress at all stages of drafting the proposal.
b. Gather input from the community towards preparation of the draft proposal.
c. Build consensus towards the final draft.
2. Decision-making procedure
2.1 The team will try to reach decisions by consensus. If consensus cannot be reached decisions will be made by simple majority vote.
2.2 Motions/Proposals must be seconded before a vote on said issue is held.
2.3 In all cases, voting will be eponymous. Only in critical cases, and where agreed by the majority of the team, may votes be anonymous.
2.2 A Chair will be appointed to organise discussions and keep order.
2.3 Team members recognize the authority of the Chair to call for order and/or to note a members position and ask said team member to move on. The Chair will also be responsible for making sure that all team members have a fair chance to express their points of view.
3. Conduct of team members
3.1 The team is large and there are many competing views and proposals. Members must remain flexible and be prepared to compromise if we are to reach an agreement. We must also compromise sensibly in order to avoid developing a camel!
3.2 The Team will be unable to discuss all points and opinions in one sitting. Team Members will have an opportunity to propose topics for inclusion in the next round of talks.
3.3 Participants are expected to be constructive, to respect the views of others and work towards finding a common ground.
3.4 Our purpose is to design organisational structures and procedures, we are not concerned with individuals.
3.5 Deliberate antagonism, personal criticism or other anti-social behaviour has no place in the discussions and will not be tolerated, either within team discussions or in threads inviting public comment on development of the draft proposal.
4. Keeping the community informed and involved If the draft proposal is to be accepted by the community, it is necessary that they be kept informed of progress and allowed to contribute to its development. However, it would be difficult for the team to hold an open debate in the forums without getting derailed by constant interjections and disputes. It is therefore suggested that:
4.1 The team hold its discussions in a private area to avoid disruption.
4.2 Transcripts or summaries of discussion on each agenda item be posted for public comment by the community.
4.3 International support sites be contacted and requested to assist in informing their communities and in gathering input on development of the draft proposal.
4.4 The team incorporate constructive and useful comments into the draft proposal.
5. ‘Venue’ for the meeting
5.1 Our members live in many different time zones, so holding a group meeting via instant messenger would be difficult:
5.2 The main discussions will be held in a private forum.
5.3 Team members may also wish to consult each other by instant messenger as they see fit to develop ideas (but please return useful results back to the forum for the group to see).
|
Item 1 of this statement (Terms of reference for the Proposal Drafting Team) was discussed, adapted and agreed on with no objections.
Item 2of this statement (Decision-making procedure) was discussed, adapted and agreed on with no objections.
There were no objections to MadFish being elected Chairperson.
Item 3 of this statement (Conduct of team members) was discussed, adapted and agreed on with no objections.
Item 4 of this statement (Keeping the community informed and involved) was discussed, adapted and agreed on with no objections.
It was decided that a three pronged approach was needed to accomplish this task. Firstly, a wiki would be maintained with up-to-date information on what has been, is and will be being discussed by the team. This wiki (the one you are reading now) will be open to the community for reference purposes. Secondly, 'Rapporteurs' would be appointed and assigned with the task of a) recording all that was discussed, and b) posting a regular news item on xoops.org with the purpose of informing and gathering feedback from the XOOPS community. Thirdly, it was recognised that informing and gathering input from the international XOOPS communities was an essential part of our job. Consequently, team members JAVesey & sailjapan with the assistance of gtop00 were appointed 'Rapporteurs'. Davidl_2 & Gibaphp accepted responsibility for maintaining the wiki, and skenow was charged with keeping the international community informed.
Item 5 of this statement (‘Venue’ for the meeting) was discussed, adapted and agreed on with no objections.
It was the teams original intention to keep our discussions in the forums provided by xoops.org. Unfortunately, on the 5th of November, much of the teams work was vandalised by persons unknown, and the venue was moved to another location. The team sincerely regret having to move, but the personal nature of one aspect of the vandalism forced their hand. Luckily sufficient back-ups of the teams work existed, and work was able to pick up where it left off with a minimum of bother. At this time team members catzwolf and bluestocking resigned their posts.
in accordance with the Statement on Procedural Matters (item 4), the team's activities are being reported, and opened to comment. Interested members of the XOOPS community can read the team's first news release on xoops.org in the news section [1][link]. Comments are invited and will be taken in to consideration with due diligence. This report prepared for the XOOPS community by the Draft Proposal Preparation Team: davidl_2, gibaphp, gtop00, JAVesey, kc0maz, madfish, mamba, phppp, predator, sailjapan, seth_sd, skenow, vaughan and wizanda.
Second Team Report
Discussion ^
HERE ^
DPT Update
<< First Report
Stage 1 ~24-10-2007
| Stage 2 ~1-11-2007
| Stage 3 ~10-11-2007
| Stage 4 ~15-11-2007
| Stage 5 ~30-11-2007
| Stage 6 ~8-12-2007
|
Community calls for change
| Team forms
| Team discusses and forms agenda
| Agenda 1 Team discusses and develops procedures
| Agenda 2 General principles for the proposal
| Agenda 3 Main functional units of the project
|
Stage 7 ~5-12-2007
| Stage 8 ~8-12-2007
| Stage 9 Current
| Stage 10
| Stage 11 ~31-12-2007
| Stage 12
|
Agenda 4 Cooperation with the current XOOPS project management bodies
| Agenda 5 Outline of the draft proposal
| Agenda 6 Development of the full proposal
| Submission to the community for final approval
| Submission to the Project Council & XOOPS Foundation
| A new XOOPS?
|
Draft Proposal 2
Stage 5: (Agenda 2) Team discusses General principles for the proposal.
|
General principles for the draft proposal
1. Democracy: Decisions should be made by groups rather than individuals, and those groups will be centered around people that are actually doing the work (thus this form of democracy exhibits some meritocratic traits).
- 1.1 Collective decision making should be implemented for each individual work group (and at each management level) in the project. For example members of a team would contribute to decisions about their own team’s activities and way of working.
- 1.2 Higher level management groups would also make collective decisions regarding their own area of responsibility.
2. Open participation: The project should allow anyone that wants to contribute, and who has the necessary skills, to participate.
- 2.1 Participation in a team will be subject to having appropriate skills or experience. Teams should define their own rules and criteria for accepting new members.
- 2.2 Team members must remain active in order to retain their membership of said team. People that become inactive will lose their membership status, however, they can rejoin later on if they begin to contribute again. A periodic review of member activity (6 monthly) should be held, followed by publication of a revised (if necessary) member list.
- 2.3 The community should be free to propose establishment of new work groups to undertake new functions. The project management should also be able to close or suggest the combination of groups where voted desirable.
3. Simplicity: The organisational structure of the project should be as simple as possible.
- 3.1 Unnecessary hierarchies, levels of management and bureaucracy should be avoided.
4. Flexibility: The project should have provisions that allow for organisational change, in order to meet the evolving needs of the community.
|
' Item 1: Democracy': There was much discussion around the words 'Democracy' and 'Meritocracy'. It was pointed out that the basic difference between them is that in meritocracy the persons are chosen (the question being, "By whom?") while in democracy they are elected. While the team thinks that members of a team should certainly be skilled enough and capable of doing the work that they have undertaken, it was decided to emphasize 'Democracy'. There was no objection to this wording.
- Item 1.1 In the eyes of the team, many of the problems experienced in the XOOPS project to date could be attributed to personalities. Often decisions were, at least apparently, made in an arbitrary and high handed manner, often in direct contradiction to the desires and needs of those who were most in need of cooperation in order to accomplish their assigned tasks. The DPP team's solution to this would be a devolution of power, and a clarification of responsibility. 'Working groups' or 'teams' would be responsible for their own work, and internal governance, though all teams would be founded on democratic principals. One member, one vote. Decisions would be made by a majority of all the team's members. There was no objection to this wording.
- Item 1.2: 'Higher levels' of management basically means what might, in the past, have been referred to as the 'Project Council'. There was no objection to this wording.
'Item 2: Open Participation': The spirit of Open Source is to use the resources which are in the community and empower them participate in a guided way. To block this will block also the project. There was no objection to this wording.
- Item 2.1: In accordance with item 1.1 above, there was no objection to this wording.
- Item 2.2: So as to maintain momentum in a particular area, and to prevent inactive members having an undue influence on a task or team, team membership should be restricted to active members. There was no objection to this wording.
- Item 2.3: In accordance with item 2 above, there was no objection to this wording.
'Item 3: Simplicity': There was no objection to this wording.
- Item 3.1: There was no objection to this wording.
Item 4: Flexibility: There was no objection to this wording.
Stage 6: (Agenda 3) Main functional units of the project:
Agenda 3: Section 2: The team cooperated to develop a definition of the main functional units of the project. Their work to date has come up with the following:
|
Section 2: Work groups
2.1: Work group structure and responsibilities
The development of the project is proposed to be carried out by the formation of six work groups as listed below. A key responsibility of each work group will be to establish a mechanism by which the general community can participate in a team's ongoing projects, or submit contributions for review and incorporation in the project's online repositories, as appropriate.
While membership of work groups is open to active members of the community (refer section 2.2), work groups will also endeavour to draw on and consolidate the contributions of the wider community; ie. they will operate as open and collaborative development platforms, not 'closed shops'.
In order to provide for the evolution of the project, provisions will also be made to allow the community to propose new work groups should a need arise, or to make amendments to the existing workgroup structure as changing circumstances require.
2.1.1. Core Development and Code Standards
- Perform a thorough review of the security of the code base as a primary priority.
- Produce Development Road map in-line with community expectations and needs.
- Innovate and maintain core software to current technical and security standards.
- Resolve legitimate bugs submitted in the tracker.
- Enlist the best and brightest open source software developers through communication, innovation and integrity.
- Assist in the training and development of emerging developers for the XOOPS Project.
- Assist in preparation of documentation concerning the core, in partnership with the Documentation group.
2.1.2. Module Development and Distribution
- Maintain a module development forge as a collaborative work facility for community module developers.
- Maintain a high-quality repository of completed modules, addons and themes for distribution to the XOOPS community in cooperation with other work groups.
- Create and maintain module packs for different applications of XOOPS including a standard pack to be made available for download with the core XOOPS distribution.
- Publish and maintain documents outlining module design specifications, best practices and security/quality assurance standards.
- Assist in the training and development of emerging module developers for the XOOPS Project
- Assist in preparation of documentation concerning module development, in partnership with the Documentation group.
- Establish dialog to identify the most desired modules sought by the community.
2.1.3. Design
- Provide sample themes with the latest technology implementations to spur community creativity.
- Maintain theme packs for different applications of XOOPS including a standard pack to be made available for download with the core XOOPS distribution.
- Publish and maintain documents outlining theme design specifications, best practices and security/quality assurance standards.
- Assist in the training and development of emerging theme developers for the XOOPS Project .
- Assist in preparation of documentation concerning theme development, in partnership with the Documentation Group.
- Establish dialog to identify the most desired themes sought by the community.
- Standardize themes across official project sites.
2.1.4. Documentation
- Create and maintain 'Hacks' repository
- Produce documentation including manuals, tutorials and articles and FAQs on the use and customisation of the core XOOPS system, third-party modules and related technical issues.
- Assist Core Development and Code Standards, Module Development and Design groups to publish development-oriented documentation.
- Maintain a repository of completed documentation and translations on behalf of the project.
2.1.5. Project Support
- Maintain and moderate official project forums according to current acceptable use policies.
- Maintain and publish moderation rules, standards and procedures and the Code of Conduct.
- Foster working relationship with XOOPS end users that promotes creativity and professionalism.
- Resolve community disputes through consensus building, mediation and general common sense.
- Develop mechanism for acquiring community input for development road map, module development, theme design and community web site enhancements
- Maintain mechanism for distributing notices regarding security updates, site outages, maintenance windows and other issues to community members.
- Provide a forum for representation of and collaboration between the Project and Certified XOOPS Community Support Sites.
- Submit useful contributions of code, themes, translations and other useful resources developed by their communities to the main project’s repositories
2.1.6. Communication
- Maintain a list of contact points to facilitate distribution of information from the project to the community and international support sites.
- Maintain mechanism for distributing notices regarding security updates, site outages, maintenance windows and other issues to community members.
- Consolidate and and edit news stories, interviews and announcements from the project teams, community and international support sites for publication and redistribution.
- Engage the international sites to provide translations and timely release of news to the appropriate community sites.
- Prepare and publish a regular email newsletter for publication to subscribers and for distribution to community and international support sites.
- Promote XOOPS through preparation and circulation of promotional materials, organising XOOPS representation in events, competitions and other publicity opportunities.
- Maintain journalistic integrity that projects professionalism and truth to the community.
- Publish quarterly updates on the activities and accomplishments of all Project Groups.
2.1.7. ADDITIONAL RESPONSIBILITIES THAT APPLY TO ALL TEAMS
- Establish a mechanism by which the community can submit contributions for review. Incorporate useful contributions in the teams work or in the project’s online repositories, as appropriate.
- Utilize the Communications and Support teams to establish ties with similarly focused teams and contributors from the international XOOPS community.
- Contribute quarterly updates and accomplishments to the Communications Group for publication.
- Maintain working relationship with the whole community and other XOOPS teams.
- Actively recruit work group members from volunteers in the whole XOOPS community considering the capacity, workload and demonstrated disposition of potential candidates, maintaining a minimum of five active team members at all times.
- Publish and maintain a list of current team members and their responsibilities or projects.
2.1.8. OTHER FUNCTIONS
Systems administration
Technical maintenance and security of project servers will be undertaken by trusted systems administrators directly appointed by the management group. The systems administrators will be work directly to the management group but will not be a voting team. The systems administrators will perform the following functions:
- Maintain project servers and install systems in accordance with latest security and performance standards.
- Implement performance enhancements with meaningful impact to the community.
- Maintain proactive monitoring and patching to prevent system failures and breaches.
- Maintain maintenance windows and communication that provides the least impact on community and international sites.
- Develop and document backup and restore procedures with documented test results to provide community confidence in the Xoops infrastructure.
- Provide Work groups with the resources they require and have received authorization from the Coordination Council to receive.
|
Stage 7: (Agenda 4): Cooperation with the current XOOPS project management bodies.
The team has been holding it's discussions with the full knowledge and in the presence of the current Project Council and Foundation, members of which were invited and have , to a greater or lesser degree, contributed. Both bodies have confirmed their willingness to act on the advice of the team once a proposal is submitted.
Stage 8: (Agenda 5) Outline of the draft proposal.
The team has outlined the draft proposal as follows. Note: The sectional headers refer to Agenda 6.x. as these will be included in the final draft.
(Agenda 6.1) Introduction
- General principles [completed]
- Summary of overall structure [note - we will write this last!]
- Organizational chart [diagram - we will prepare this last!]
(Agenda 6.2) Work groups
- List of work groups [completed]
- Name and functions of each work group [Terms of Reference]
- Work group management [completed]
- Membership
- Decision making
- Election of representatives
- Reporting
- Formation and dissolution of new work groups
(Agenda 6.3) Project management
- Coordination group [under discussion]
- Role and functions [Terms of Reference]
- Membership
- Decision making
- Reporting
- [Other coordination positions?] [under discussion]
(Agenda 6.4) Administration of project finances and property
- Project accounts and funds [under discussion]
- Intellectual property [under discussion]
- Other assets [eg hardware] [under discussion]
- Auditing and reporting [under discussion]
- Legal representation [under discussion]
- External collaboration [eg. with other projects, universities, companies] [under discussion]
(Agenda 6.5) Annex 1: Code of conduct
- Expectations and acceptable conduct of all project members. [under discussion]
(Agenda 6.6) Annex 2: Comments on and Evaluation of existing proposals.
- Team's feedback on each proposal [under discussion]
Stage 9: (Agenda 6) Development of the full proposal.
The team is now in the process of debating the finer details of and drafting the final proposal, as indicated in the status [red] notation above. The most recent section to have been debated and agreed on is Section 2.2 Work group management as below:
|
'Agenda 6: Section 2.2: Work group management
The following rules will apply to all project work groups:
2.2.1 Membership
- Any member of the XOOPS Community may lodge an expression of interest to join a work group. The decision to accept a new member will be made by consensus of a work group’s existing members. As a general principle, any community member that wishes to participate, has the necessary skills and is in good standing should be permitted to do so.
- The membership will be temporary for 3 months (with no voting rights), after which the group will decide on full membership (with voting rights)
- There is no fixed term of membership. However, a member that is inactive for more than three months (ie. does not contribute to the activities of the work group or participate in team meetings) or violates the project’s Code of Conduct will lose their membership status and their responsibilities will be transferred to other members. Lapsed members may request to rejoin the work group at a later date, if they become active again.
- The work group Coordinator will actively recruit new members from volunteers in the XOOPS community considering the capacity, workload and demonstrated disposition of potential candidates. There is no limit to the number of active members a work group may have. The Coordinator will endeavour to maintain a minimum of five active members at any given time.
- Members are expected to abide by the Code of Conduct, which describes the standard of behaviour expected from members of work groups and the wider community.
2.2.2. Election of work group representative
- Each work group will appoint a Coordinator by consensus or vote of its members. Coordinators will normally serve for one year and the position shall be re-opened for election on an annual basis. An election may also be called at any time by a majority of work group members.
- Coordinators must ensure that management arrangements are in place for their work group at all times. Coordinators should delegate their responsibilities to another member if they are likely to be temporarily unavailable for a period. After elections, Coordinator should assign a Deputy Coordinator, who will carry on Coordinator's tasks, if Coordinator is not available. This will establish a clear responsibility, so we don't have to track if he assigned somebody or not.
- If a Coordinator is inactive for more than one month without delegating their responsibilities, or inactive for more than three months in total, a new Coordinator will be elected to avoid interruption to the group's activities..
- The project management group should be advised in advance of an election, and of the result.
2.2.3. Decision making
- The work group will endeavor to make internal decisions by discussion and consensus. Where consensus cannot be reached any member may request an issue be put to a simple majority vote. In the event of a tie, the work group coordinator shall have the casting vote.
2.2.4. Reporting
- The work group Coordinator shall report progress to the XOOPS Community at least once per quarter via the Communications work group, and shall provide an annual summary of the group's outputs for the information of the community. The report should be once a month. If nothing is done, they should also report it.
- The work group membership, terms of reference and a contact point shall be made publicly available on www.xoops.org.
2.2.5. Amendments to the work group management rules and terms of reference
- Amendments to the work group management rules or to its terms of reference (tasks) may be proposed by work group members or by the XOOPS Community, at any time.
- Proposed amendments shall be considered by the project management group at its next meeting and the result published within one month.
- In the case of proposed changes to an individual work group’s terms of reference, the concerned work group will first consider the change and make a recommendation to the project management group, before a decision is made.
2.2.6. Formation and dissolution of new working groups
- The community may propose the formation of new work groups, or amendments to existing work groups at any time. Proposals shall be considered by the project management group at its next meeting with decisions made on a case-by-case basis according to merit and the interests of the community as a whole.
- The proponents of a new work group or proposed amendment should provide a written statement to the management group explaining the benefit to the community, the impact on existing work groups (if any), and in the case of a new work group, a list of contributors that have agreed to support its activities.
- The management group may dissolve or merge work groups if: i) there is no participation, ii) the mission of a work group is fulfilled (in which case members may join other work groups as appropriate) or iii) the creation or amendment of another work group renders it redundant.
|
..
|
|